Virgilijus Alekna Training Program
'Triathletes are now hitting the gym to not only reduce their injury risk, but to also improve their performance.”Every Tuesday we’ll feature a different coach’s workout you can complete in 60 mins (or less!)This week’s workout comes from, the creator of TRI-FIT, a group fitness model specifically designed for triathletes as well as a certified Ironman coach. After a decade of working in Australia, Coach Si is currently residing in Derby, U.K.“Strength and conditioning has always been a taboo phrase in the arena of triathlon preparation,” says Bennett. “Some swear by it and some steer clear of it. Nonetheless, triathletes are now hitting the gym to not only reduce their injury risk, but to also improve their performance.”Below is a total body strength and conditioning session that anyone can do in their training space or at a local gym. For this workout, you’ll need a spin bike/trainer setup, a treadmill (or outdoor running), a foam roller, a medicine ball and a gym mat.The run will serve as a building warm-up for the main strength set. The med ball circuit is designed to improve strength endurance for swimming, activate your glutes and build lower body strength for more power in the saddle. It also serves to increase the core stability needed to be a more balanced and efficient runner.
For the first round, use a ball no heavier than 10 pounds—increase on later sets if you’re comfortable with doing the movements properly.
Virgilijus Alekna Training Program Free
10July2019Two businessmen have become millionaires through a Lithuanian lottery — without buying a single ticket.Antanas Muraska and Donatas Kazlauskas, the two directors of the Olifeja lottery, have diverted millions of euros into their own pockets, according to an investigation by OCCRP‘s Lithuanian member center, 15min.lt.Olifeja was and still is much more than a private venture. It was founded to fund Lithuania’s Olympic athletes. More than two decades after the company’s establishment, it still calls itself an “Olympic lottery,” and is still the principal funding source for the Lithuanian National Olympic Committee. Donatas Kazlauskas.Credit:Zygimantas Gedvila / 15minThe committee’s former president, Arturas Poviliunas, said he trusted the pair to make decisions, and knew nothing of its operations. Shortly after retiring, Poviliunas became president of one of the committee’s branches that received thousands of dollars from a separate lottery business run by Muraska and Kazlauskas.
That one supported Poviliunas’ passion for writing.Lithuanian legislator Agne Bilotaite, who spent several terms specializing in anti-corruption policies, has described the appropriation of Olifeja’s profits as a “robbery of the sports community.”On the other hand, the country’s prosecutor’s office has said that it found no evidence of unlawful activity.Olifeja estimates it donated about $93 million to sports between 2004 and 2018. Taking a Cut – and AnotherOlifeja was established in 1992 with the sole purpose of raising money to fund Lithuanian athletes. It is now the largest lottery operator in the country, currently controlling 79 percent of the market.The company was the creation of Muraska, then a senior accountant for Lithuania’s Committee of Physical Education and Sports.
He approached the National Olympic Committee with the idea of starting a lottery to benefit athletes, and came up with the company‘s name, a mash-up of the Lithuanian words for Olympic and fairy.After the Olympic committee approved the idea, Muraska became Olifeja’s director, a position he still occupies. He was joined by Kazlauskas, the Olympic committee treasurer.
When the first lottery tickets were being printed in Ukraine in the early 1990s, it was Kazlauskas, Olifeja’s deputy director, who drove them to Lithuania in the trunk of his car.When Olifeja was founded, the Olympic committee was entitled to all of the lottery‘s profits as its sole shareholder. The company distributed the funds to the country’s athletic federations for athlete training and Olympic preparation.That changed in 2000, when Muraska and Kazlauskas sold themselves a 47 percent stake in the company in return for a $225,000 investment. Nearly half of its profits would now go to them. On its website, the company reported that it needed the capital infusion in the aftermath of the Russian economic crisis of 1998, which created problems across the region.The Olympic committee approved the sweetheart deal — which was just Muraska and Kazlauskas’ first cut.Almost three years later, Olifeja began a merger with a subsidiary that operated its lottery terminals and distribution infrastructure.
The company said the move was meant to cut costs and optimize operations. According to its own calculations, Olifeja could save more than $2.5 million annually by bringing those services in-house.But shortly afterward, Muraska and Kazlauskas established a business of their own, a lottery service provider called Lotelita. In April 2004, Olifeja sold its newly acquired terminals to Lotelita for about $700,000. The new company became Olifeja’s official lottery services provider, though Olifeja had just absorbed its subsidiary so it could do that job itself.As justification for the deal, Muraska has said the terminals were outdated and in need of replacement — just “iron,” as he put it — and that the price his company had paid for them “exceeded their value.”But almost immediately, the outdated terminals became a big money-maker.
Millions began flowing from Olifeja into the new business. In 2004 alone, Olifeja paid Lotelita almost $6 million for use of the approximately 1,100 terminals and other lottery services, more than seven times the cost the company had incurred in buying the terminals.It didn’t take long before Lotelita began to expand its business further, based largely around those same terminals, which are common sights in Lithuanian convenience stores and gas stations.
Training Program Template
Lotelita repurposed them to serve mobile operators, collect utility payments, and even issue quick loans — all for a fee that went straight to Lotelita. Meanwhile, Olifeja is still paying for the use of the terminals, which now number over 2,000.As a result, in 2004, for example, Lotelita‘s net profit was more than $1.2 million, most of which came from its contracts with Olifeja. In the same year, Olifeja’s net profit was under a million dollars. The difference grew even bigger the following year, when Lotelita outmatched Olifeja by a landslide, earning $2 million of net profits versus Olifeja’s $479,000. Unlike Olifeja, Lotelita had no obligation to share its profits with the Olympic committee or its athletes.From Lotelita‘s establishment in 2003 until 2017, Olifeja paid it more than $120 million for lottery-related services.
In Lotelita’s early years, Olifeja’s money made up to 90 percent of its total income. As Muraska’s and Kazlauskas’ business network grew, its sources of income became more diverse and the Olifeja money grew less significant. New WinningsLotelita also made money in other ways. For example, Olifeja sold its office to Lotelita for about $2.2 million in 2003 and began renting part of the building it had previously owned. Up to the end of 2017, Olifeja has paid more than $2.26 million in rent.Lotelita has also been contracted by Olifeja to produce a television lottery show, Teleloto, which has an enormous audience in Lithuania. Olifeja also hired Lotelita as its main marketing service provider.The two Olympic businessmen even used the lottery as a personal bank. Both Muraska and Kazlauskas received interest-free loans from Olifeja.
Muraska used his loan of around 360,000 euros to build a luxury house in Lithuania’s capital, Vilnius. Kazlauskas used a 107,000-euro loan to buy a flat in Juodkrante, a small town on the Curonian Spit, a U.N.
Effective Training Program
World Heritage Site and one of Lithuania’s most picturesque places.Additionally, in 2005, Lotelita gave Muraska another interest-free loan of 1.7 million litas, or about 492,000 euros.Both businessmen told 15min that making personal loans to employees was once a “common practice” at Olifeja, though it ceased after 2008, when the Lithuanian tax office banned such deals.The two men didn’t confine themselves to lottery services. In the years after getting their first major contract from Olifeja, Muraska and Kazlauskas set up a business facilitating payday loans, an insurance brokerage, and even another lottery company that competes directly with Olifeja.In 2008, for reasons that remain unclear, Olifeja used 3 million litas (about $1.2 million) to secure a loan for the duo’s payment processing and lending company, UAB Perlo Paslaugos.These businesses ended up being more profitable than Olifeja itself, earning Muraska and Kazlauskas $37 million in net profits. The two men also received about $11 million in dividends from Olifeja between 2003 and 2017, according to reporter’s calculations based on the company’s annual reports.
Reluctant Millionaires?Muraska and Kazlauskas have explained their actions by citing restrictive legislation.A new lottery law that came into force in 2004 made it impossible for Olifeja to service its own lottery terminals or conduct any other form of business, such as marketing, television production, or even owning its own building, they said.Muraska also has said Lithuanian officials told them that having a service-providing subsidiary for Olifeja was not an option.“I was told that organizing lotteries is the only thing. And that’s it.